Activist group have condemned the latest draft text of an agreement that aims to protect rainforests as a means to mitigate climate change.

The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) text has been stripped of its chief goal to reduce forest clearing by at least 50 percent by 2020, while key safeguards to protect indigenous people and biodiversity and limit forest conversion to plantations have been moved from the operative section of the agreement to a non-binding preamble.

The language obliging consuming countries to take steps to address their role in driving deforestation have also been relegated to the preamble.

Nathaniel Dyer of Rainforest Foundation UK said: “It’s hardly surprising that developing countries won’t commit to global targets for deforestation when rich countries haven’t yet provided the necessary financing for REDD or global targets for deep reductions of industrial emissions.”

“Limiting safeguards to the preamble weakens the agreement and deprives it of any assurance of compliance,” added Rosalind Reeve of Global Witness.

“Clearly, everyone agrees that the world’s tropical forests need to be protected,” said Bill Barclay of Rainforest Action Network.

“But good intentions aren’t enough, they have to be paired with action. Ministers must act to strengthen the REDD text next week if we have any hope of a REDD that will be effective in protecting tropical forests.”

“The outcome of the negotiations of REDD under the UNFCCC will be crucial for the future of tropical rainforests and forest-dependent peoples,” said Jerôme Sitamon of Maison de l´Enfant et de la Femme Pygmées (MEFP), Central African Republic, in a statement released by the Accra Caucus, a coalition of over 100 non-governmental organizations from 30 countries.

“If we lose the battle against deforestation we lose the battle against climate change.”

Via MongaBay